Envisioning the Future of Learning for Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

How can educators, teachers and trainers stay current and address the dynamic opportunities of creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship teaching and training? This book offers an overview of the VISION research project, which provides an understanding of the future of education in these areas and describes the approach taken by the VISION team, including the findings of interviews with more than 130 global stakeholders

Portfolio management in double unknown situations: technological platformsand the role of cross-application managers

International audienceThis article investigates portfoliomanagement in double unknown situations. Double unknown refers toa situation in which the level of uncertainty is high and both technology and markets are as-yet-unknown. This situation can be an opportunityfor new discoveries, creation of new performance solutions and giving direction to portfolio structuring. The literature highlights that the double unknown situation is a prerequisite to designinggeneric technologies that are able to address many existing and emerging markets and create value across a broad range of applications. The purpose of this paper is to investigatethe initial phases of generic technology governance and associated portfolio structuring in multi-project firms.We studiedthree empirical contexts of portfolio structuring at the European Semiconductor provider STMicroelectronics. The results demonstrate that 1) portfolio management for generic technologies is highly transversal and comprises creating both modules to address market complementarities and the core element of a technological system – the platform and 2) the design of generic technologies requires "cross-application" managers who are able to supervise the interactions among innovative concepts developed in different business and research groups and who are responsible for structuring and managing technological and marketing exploration portfolios within the organizational structures of a company

A new perspective for risk management: a study of the design of generic technology with a matroid model in C-K theory

International audienceRisk management today has its main roots in decision theory paradigm (Friedman and Savage 1948). It consists in making the optimal choice between given possible decisions and probable states of nature. In this paper we extend this model to include a design capacity to deal with risk situations. A design perspective leads to add a new action possibility in the model: to design a new alternative to deal with the probable states of nature. The new alternative design might also "create" new risks, so that a design perspective leads also to model the emergence of new risks as an exogenous "design process". Hence a design perspective raises two issues: can we design an alternative that would lower the risk? Does this new alternative create new risks? We show (1) that minimizing known risks consists in designing an alternative whose success is independent from all the known risks – this alternative can be considered as a generic technology. We show (2)that the design of this generic technology depends on the structure of the unknown, ie the structure of the space generated by the concept of risk-free alternative. (3) We identify new strategies to deal with risks as dealing with the unknown

Platform emergence in double unknown: Common challenge strategy

International audienceThe proposed paper deals with platform emergence in double unknown situations when technology and markets are highly uncertain. The interest in technological platform development to enable creation of products and processes that support present and future development of multiple options is widely recognized by practitioners and academics The existing literature considers already existing platforms and the development is based on exploiting this common platform core to build future markets and technological derivatives. However, when we are in double unknown situations, markets and technologies are highly uncertain and neither options, nor platform core are known. Thus, how can one ensure platform emergence in double unknown?The history of innovation promotes mostly singular challenge strategy to guide innovative development. But in certain sectors, like semiconductors, telecommunications, pharmaceuticals, the success of common challenge strategy applicable to several markets is more important than singular project success. Thus, which strategy to choose for innovative technological platform emergence? Why common challenge strategy appears to be so challenging and risky? The objective of the paper is to define what are the precise market and technological conditions that in certain situations lead to 1) develop common building block (common core) that facilitate all the others projects but don't provide access directly to the market 2) launch singular project exploration to emerge future platform core consequently. We attempt to address our research questions by formally describing each strategy and fabricating simple economical model to compare them. For simulation the data was created by taking into account specifics of real management situations and parameters were chosen based on the literature review. Then we illustrate the insights of the model through a case study of innovative technology development in semiconductor industry. The in-depth empirical case study was conducted in STMicroelectronics, one of the leaders in the semiconductor industry. The data for case study was gathered from advanced technology platform with several interdependent modules developed by company and introduced to the several markets after all. This paper contributes to existing work on platform emergence by introducing the strategy of platform core construction in double unknown based on future common challenge investigation

Innovation et compétition entre plateformes technologiques : vers une stratégie basée sur la pervasivité des technologies

International audienceL’objectif de cette communication est de mettre en évidence un nouveau cadre théorique pour penser la stratégie de compétition entre plateformes technologiques, indépendamment des logiques de marchés. Nous démontrons que la compétition ne se joue pas seulement sur le marché ; et qu’un des défis majeur de l’innovation technologique est d’être capable de subvertir les systèmes techniques des autres acteurs industriels (concurrents, fournisseurs, partenaires, clients, etc.). Nous présentons ensuite un nouveau critère de performance stratégique pour illustrer l’effet systémique d’une technologie sur l’espace des techniques : la pervasivité d’une technologie. Ce concept permet d’exprimer la faculté d’une invention technique à transformer et à réorganiser d’autres systèmes techniques ainsi que sa capacité à se diffuser à travers un large ensemble de technologies. Aussi, mener une stratégie de pervasivité technologique suppose de contrôler le degré de transformation des différents systèmes techniques, tout en augmentant le nombre de relations entre différents systèmes. Afin de tester nos hypothèses et en raison du caractère exploratoire de cette recherche, nous avons opté pour une étude de cas unique basée sur une approche qualitative. Nous illustrons notre modèle à travers l’étude de l’activité de conception et de développement de la technologie FD-SOI (Fully Depleted Silicon On Insulator) chez STMicroelectronics, leader européen dans l’industrie du semi-conducteur

Designing generic technologies in Energy Research: learning from two CEA technologies for double unknown management

International audienceThe aim of this paper is to shed light on an innovative strategy for the design of generic technologies (GTs). Research on radical innovation management, while recognizing the success of GTs, generally describes their design according to evolutionary strategies featuring multiple and uncertain trials, which would finally result in the discovery of common features between multiple applications. Building on a case study conducted on two technological development programs at the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), we exhibit an anomaly to this rarely discussed idea: we describe an alternative strategy that consists in intentionally designing common features that bridge the gap between a priori heterogeneous applications and a priori heterogeneous technologies. This anomaly brings three main results: 1) The usual trial-and-learning strategy is not necessarily the only strategy to design a GT; 2) beyond technological breakthrough, the value of GTs also relies on the capacity to reuse and connect existing technologies; 3) the design of GT might require sophisticated organizational patterns to be able to involve multiple technology suppliers and applications' providers

Gestion de risque en situation de double inconnu : théorie, modèle et organisation pour la conception de technologies génériques

Can a company organize development with controlled risk while promising markets and eligible technologies are yet unknown? These situations cannot be handled with classical techno push or market pull strategies; and "trial and learning" processes are too unpredictable and too costly while facing with unknowns in high-tech. However, in some industries such as semiconductors, one has to organize exploration while controlling costs and risks in double unknown. In this situation the success of technological development in double unknown is correlated with the existence of generic technologies. Though, it remains unclear how to account for the design of generic technologies. This thesis models the design of generic technologies and investigates the associated models of collective action.This work is based on four main results:1) an original model of risk management that consists of identifying “common unknown” for several potential applications; 2) the modeling and simulation defining the techno-economic conditions in which the introduced “common unknown” strategy is relevant; 3) The characterization of the notion of generic technological concepts and the process of genericity design built upon the most recent design theory formalisms ; 4) a new managerial figure, the «cross-application manager », essential for the success of generic technologies design.Comment assurer un développement à risques limités alors que marchés et technologies sont inconnus? Ces situations ne peuvent pas être gérées par les stratégies existantes comme market pull ou techno push; et le processus type « trial and learning » apparaît trop coûteux et imprévisible. Or certaines industries comme les semi-conducteurs doivent organiser des développements technologiques à coûts et risques contrôlés, alors que les inconnues techniques et commerciales sont très importantes. Dans ces situations le sucés coïncide avec l'existence des technologies génériques. Mais comment concevoir ces technologies génériques? La thèse modélise la conception des technologies génériques et étudie des modelés d'action collective associés.Ce travail débouche sur quatre résultats principaux : 1) Une stratégie de gestion du risque original, consistant à identifier un « common unknown » ; 2) Un travail de modélisation et de simulation précisant les critères de contingence de cette nouvelle stratégie; 3) La caractérisation de concepts génériques et de processus de conception de généricité a l'aide des théories de la conception les plus récentes; 4) Une nouvelle figure managériale, le « cross-application manager», indispensable pour le succès de la conception de technologies génériques

Risk management in double unknown : theory, model and organization for the design of generic technologies

Comment assurer un développement à risques limités alors que marchés et technologies sont inconnus? Ces situations ne peuvent pas être gérées par les stratégies existantes comme market pull ou techno push; et le processus type « trial and learning » apparaît trop coûteux et imprévisible. Or certaines industries comme les semi-conducteurs doivent organiser des développements technologiques à coûts et risques contrôlés, alors que les inconnues techniques et commerciales sont très importantes. Dans ces situations le sucés coïncide avec l'existence des technologies génériques. Mais comment concevoir ces technologies génériques? La thèse modélise la conception des technologies génériques et étudie des modelés d'action collective associés.Ce travail débouche sur quatre résultats principaux : 1) Une stratégie de gestion du risque original, consistant à identifier un « common unknown » ; 2) Un travail de modélisation et de simulation précisant les critères de contingence de cette nouvelle stratégie; 3) La caractérisation de concepts génériques et de processus de conception de généricité a l'aide des théories de la conception les plus récentes; 4) Une nouvelle figure managériale, le « cross-application manager», indispensable pour le succès de la conception de technologies génériques.Can a company organize development with controlled risk while promising markets and eligible technologies are yet unknown? These situations cannot be handled with classical techno push or market pull strategies; and "trial and learning" processes are too unpredictable and too costly while facing with unknowns in high-tech. However, in some industries such as semiconductors, one has to organize exploration while controlling costs and risks in double unknown. In this situation the success of technological development in double unknown is correlated with the existence of generic technologies. Though, it remains unclear how to account for the design of generic technologies. This thesis models the design of generic technologies and investigates the associated models of collective action.This work is based on four main results:1) an original model of risk management that consists of identifying “common unknown” for several potential applications; 2) the modeling and simulation defining the techno-economic conditions in which the introduced “common unknown” strategy is relevant; 3) The characterization of the notion of generic technological concepts and the process of genericity design built upon the most recent design theory formalisms ; 4) a new managerial figure, the «cross-application manager », essential for the success of generic technologies design

Digital Technologies in the Workplace: A Ne(s)t of Paradoxes

Digital technologies are omnipresent in our professional and personal lives. While they provide manifold potentials, digital technologies also cause tensions. Many of these tensions are of paradox nature – they confront individuals with conflicting, yet synergetic and interdependent, alternatives that persist over time. Coping with ten-sions by unlocking their potential through a paradox mindset has become an increas-ingly valuable capability. By using a qualitative research design and applying a par-adox lens to the interview data from middle managers, this study explores the ten-sions that managers perceive in the increasingly digital workplace. We find empirical support for a previously identified paradox (the autonomy paradox) and we identify additional paradoxical tensions, which increase with rising exposure to digital tech-nologies – the information, interaction, opportunity, and engagement paradoxes. Furthermore, our results indicate a nested, meta-paradoxical nature of the engage-ment and opportunity paradoxes that combine a wide variety of tensions in an over-arching theme

How firms undertake organizational changes to shift to more-exploratory strategies: A process perspective

International audienceFirms' organization of exploratory research has interested scholars of both research policy and organization theory, yet we still know too little about how firms undertake organizational changes to shift to more-exploratory strategies. Adopting a process perspective, we explore this question through a longitudinal, comparative case study of a Danish pharmaceutical firm and a French-Italian semiconductor firm. We demonstrate how firms adjust their organizational structures to increase exploration, a process of constantly addressing countervailing organizational and interorganizational demands by deploying, combining, and changing balancing mechanisms at the organizational and managerial levels. Moreover, our findings show that firms' different organizational structures affect their adaptations to exploratory outcomes. These findings advance theory because they illuminate the dynamic interplay between firms' adjustments of organizational structures and their movements toward more exploration. We use a recursive process model to theorize our findings